MRI Research - Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging, Brain Tumors

MRI Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about MRI, including details on magnetic resonance imaging, neuroimaging, brain tumors.


MRI Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About MRI

Books on MRI

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



The optimal use of contrast agents at high field MRI.

Trattnig S, Pinker K, Ba-Ssalamah A, Nöbauer-Huhmann IM

Center of Excellence High field MRI, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Vienna, Medical School, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. siegfried.trattnig@meduniwien.ac.at

The intravenous administration of a standard dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents produces higher contrast between the tumor and normal brain at 3.0 Tesla (T) than at 1.5 T, which allows reducing the dose to half of the standard one to produce similar contrast at 3.0 T compared to 1.5 T. The assessment of cumulative triple-dose 3.0 T images obtained the best results in the detection of brain metastases compared to other sequences. The contrast agent dose for dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T can be reduced to 0.1 mmol compared to 0.2 mmol at 1.5 T due to the increased susceptibility effects at higher magnetic field strengths. Contrast agent application makes susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 3.0 T clinically attractive, with an increase in spatial resolution within the same scan time. Whereas a double dose of conventional gadolinium-based contrast agents was optimal in SWI with respect to sensitivity and image quality, a standard dose of gadobenate dimeglumine, which has a two-fold higher T1-relaxivity in blood, produced the same effect. For MR-arthrography, optimized concentrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents are similar at 3.0 and 1.5 T. In summary, high field MRI requires the optimization of the contrast agent dose in different clinical applications.

Published 5 June 2006 in Eur Radiol, 16(6): 1280-7.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 MRI Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



MRI Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (April)
  Issue 2 (May)
  Issue 3 (June)
  Issue 4 (July)
  Issue 5 (August)
  Issue 6 (September)
  Issue 7 (October)
  Issue 8 (November)
  Issue 9 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)



MRI Books

Clinical Cardiac MRI: With Interactive CD-ROM (Medical Radiology / Diagnostic Imaging)

Clinical Cardiac MRI: With Interactive CD-ROM (Medical Radiology / Diagnostic Imaging)