MRI Research - Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging, Brain Tumors

MRI Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about MRI, including details on magnetic resonance imaging, neuroimaging, brain tumors.


MRI Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About MRI

Books on MRI

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Correlation of end plate shape on MRI and disc degeneration in surgically treated patients with degenerative disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus.

Pappou IP, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP

Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The sagittal profile of the lumbar end plates on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been investigated in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) or herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). PURPOSE: To examine the shape of the end plates in patients treated surgically for a) low back pain or b) radiculopathy with HNP. Furthermore, to investigate the correlation between end plate shape and disc degeneration on the one, and end plate shape and symptoms on the other. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of charts and radiographs. METHODS: The charts, operative reports, preoperative lateral plain radiographs, and MRI scans of 178 patients (85 with low back pain and 93 with HNP) were reviewed. End plate shape was determined on midsagittal MRI cuts, disc degeneration was graded on T2 sequences, and disc height was measured on lateral plain radiographs from L1 to S1 in all patients. Student t-test and chi(2) test were used to detect significant differences and associations. RESULTS: Flat and irregular levels were most common in the lower lumbar spine. The L5/S1 segment was flat in most cases, due to a flat sacral end plate. In DDD patients, disc degeneration on MRI and plain radiographs worsened from concave to flat, to irregular levels. In HNP patients, MRI demonstrated concave levels to be less degenerated, whereas no difference was detected between flat and irregular levels. Disc height of irregular levels was well preserved in HNP patients. Comparing the two groups, flat levels were more degenerated on MRI in HNP patients. Despite similar degrees of degeneration on MRI, concave and irregular levels in DDD patients had lower disc heights. A higher frequency of symptoms was found in flat and irregular levels for both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: The sagittal profile of end plates in the lumbar spine was described for patients with DDD on the one and HNP on the other. A higher association with symptoms was observed for flat and irregular levels in both patient groups. In DDD patients, disck degeneration on both MRI and plain radiographs increased from concave to flat, to irregular levels. In HNP patients, MRI demonstrated concave levels to be less degenerated, whereas no difference was detected between flat and irregular levels. Disc height of irregular levels was well preserved in HNP patients. Comparing the two groups of patients, flat levels were more degenerated on MRI in HNP patients. Despite similar degrees of degeneration on MRI, concave and irregular levels in DDD patients had lower disc heights. The correlation of symptoms and disc degeneration with the end plate shapes is not definitive evidence of end plate remodeling around degenerated discs. It may simply represent the higher rate of disc degeneration in the lower lumbar levels. This analysis did not provide any hints as to which degenerated discs are more likely to herniated and cause leg symptoms or cause predominantly low back pain.

Published 1 January 2007 in Spine J, 7(1): 32-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 MRI Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



MRI Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (April)
  Issue 2 (May)
  Issue 3 (June)
  Issue 4 (July)
  Issue 5 (August)
  Issue 6 (September)
  Issue 7 (October)
  Issue 8 (November)
  Issue 9 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



MRI Books

Rad Tech's Guide to MRI: Basic Physics, Instrumentation, and Quality Control (Rad Tech Series)

Rad Tech's Guide to MRI: Basic Physics, Instrumentation, and Quality Control (Rad Tech Series)